“The Noche Buena project consists of two separate mining concessions comprising approximately 1,000 hectares which expire in 2052. Access to the concessions has been granted to Seabridge by the surface owner. The project is accessed by way of Mexico paved Highway #2 between Caborca and Sonoyta, Mexico and then by a 27 kilometer dirt road directly to the site”
http://seabridgegold.net/News/Article/70/seabridge-to-acquire-noche-buena-gold-project
“The Caborca Project consists of 7,400 acres (3,000 hectares). On or about July 11, 2011, we acquired five additional claims surrounding the Caborca Project consisting of approximately 1,000 additional acres.” Makes about 3,400 ha or 3.4 times sized.
Oct ’12 report was surface samples with no serious lab drill assays which should be included now in Fresnillo’s DD as they were made available as cores logged around 100-200′ max . I’d fail to see how they’d not take the trouble to have them checked closely if a serious attempt made to reach any deal. I know PT did not bruise any egos taking all that time to let them eval thoroughly while everybody bitched over inactivity even though placer was constantly being relocated same period as blast permit submitted . As a much bigger, better sited process is not about to do same 2 oz daily. Would still make sense for them to join on but after spending own resources to set up the resource drilling and process that nag’s left the barn. Will be using same Mex Highway 2 for decades, wave on way to the bank (Sound of one hand holding for atheists in the fox hole).
Best I’m aware PT’s always crossed T’s and dotted I’s but NEVER enough so one needs to stop attacking normalcy.
Link reference got a little distant using Carl Sandburg’s elderly next door neighbor, Julia Abigail Fletcher Carney’s, “Little drops of water, little grains of sand” etc… Nothing big’s done at once. Granny was a Fletcher, a Texas rancher’s daughter and Grandpa was 1/4 Cherokee Indian Territory, Ashley, cotton farmer. Edited it out but love the hoe down song.
Negotiations with “Canadian Miner” were not continued after Aug 25 PR, a prospective “Major Miner” we know for certain was Fresnillo came under consideration Oct 17th PR. Were allowed on site to survey, map and sample with agreement they would release their Due Diligence findings. Mexus was keeping options open with discussions with other miners said now still ongoing. We know the When, Jan 26th, with the If, a rejection of the inadequate offer by Fresnillo. Based on what I think I see hearing ( hear seeing?) it was the ability to tie up development more than financial consideration although may be both, caused the fall through but may never actually know the total offer of a rejected full JV operation. Doing business will mean many decisions seen possible but very few actually completed as a that’s that; finite. Next….? 8