Good as a repost’ll git. Now, dictionary please. Master of speakin in  tongues granted at this i’stnce . Kneel and arise a G’night!. But end a preposition ? wait a sec! HOWL! A noetic Noel, Sir G’night!  8  U made my blog!
gitreal post# 11947

Post #  of 11957

I’m curious, besides expert opinions of people who are posting on this board (ocular perceiver roll), where is ANY document or test or study that has shown estimates or engenderment prospects of anywhere was not met?

Can argue all day long about the estimates, one person verbalizes doable and then the other verbally expresses SCAM (which is a jest by the way, we all ken not a scam in terms of denotement used), but show me one piece of evidence exhibiting it’s erroneous. They have missed time frames, and have had issues with PR releases, ok. Until work is authentically done and we optically discern true results, verbalizing with the validity is just an ASSumption predicated on one’s erudition or personal noetic conceptions on how to come up with a number. I know enough to know that this stock is a penny stock with a plethora of upside. Could you lose it all, of course. Transpires everyday, all day. You can lose your shorts with even immensely colossal legitimate players. But a legitimate company like Argo doesn’t accede to pay $500,000 to survey the area without full erudition and consent of the legitimate company. That 500K doesn’t include the attorney fees, and other cost associated to putting the pristine deal together. Unless you are Exec with Argo, you can’t sit there and bold face prevarication and make up postulations about why they didn’t move on. That right there is fraud/deception, for a person to sit and verbally express things transpired a certain way when there is no proof except the exact antithesis which has been verbalized with