Thanks Belgie.  It’s  an old ploy  to couch  distaste as  friendly  advice.  Has been removed actually  as  I  was  replying  as  a tad I feel unwarranted and surely  my  main reason  for  avoiding  there so  very long.  Absolutely no need  for  the  guff involved particularly  this of  all periods . Cold figures:

In Jan was an avg 3.83 posts a day including mine since the 8th. That’s called near DEAD not rambling. Easy to see none have much to say since little is known to say much about. Few others? I’m also a  known early and  large holding   expert? LODE ( not making any rich), 17 for 1.417, GORO 5 for true dead .417. Post was a reply to “Cheers” salutation and the Normism accurately describes any mining operation when my shorts get chewed up and spit out. Flavors a lot of my investment reasoning but I do understand the comment’s a lot in my face. GOD’S SAKE must talk something or a board can go belly up fast. RB Mexus seems to have nothing to say except my blogging or what I have posted I hub since the 8th. Not certain if there’s a space limitation but I AM certain it was not exceeded nor the 15 daily. No great loss my side as   you’re one  of  the one’s  I’m  pleased  to be  on  with there. 8

“Was wondering how long it would take to start questioning your posts on IHUB. One of the moderators, who should NOT be a moderator, lode making me rich, just posted about ramblings being posted, obviously aimed at you. Either IHUB or one of the other mods removed the post a few minutes ago.

I posted my thoughts a few minutes ago. Let’s see if it gets deleted too.
——————–
We as shareholders or interested parties in Mexus Gold, of course are here to talk about Mexus and its dealings, prospects, potential.

However, I believe we are also here to build community among ourselves. So learning more about each other when there is a news void is a good thing. It supports the company and may lead to more interest in the company, not less.

I would argue that allowing the largest shareholder in Mexus to give us some of his background and post articles like John Embry’s is a positive for all here. The article actually referred to the type of situation Mexus may soon be in, a very small producer with a very undervalued market cap.

What say we allow a certain amount of discourse, with the goal being to build a positive influence on the Mexus share price and market cap?”

Penoles  background
Gold  Resource Corp was a  ’98 spin off name  from US Gold once  named  Silver State Mining.  Clever names  both as  folks  speak of  US gold  price and   having  discovered  a  gold  resource.  Actually  the  initial property  Pepe  took them to even before  US Gold  sold  to Rob was  a  Penoles  played out  silver  mine  in central Zimepan. Property  adjoined  held by  2  sisters passed  from their  dad. David  drilled  up nothing even from down in the Penoles  miles  of  tunnels. My 1st  experience  with Penoles was  quite  generous in allowing  the   drills   down below but  a  hit’d  expanded  their  resource  as  well.  Quit and visited  Oaxaca old hill top mine shaft El Aguila  and  found a rich deposit 2nd  try in  2003. Good gold, great silver  then tunnel polymetals as  open pit  dug  out in a  planned year.  US Steel  once ran the  giant  Yearington copper  deposit now  reopening and Union Oil did  metals  drilling in  explore  all across Nevada. Name  of  the  game is  making  money  not  the name  game so call it  what  you  will. Names   do get  wildly off when  an IPO is purchased  so Mexus  Gold was  changed  from Action Fashions. But  isn’t  action always in  fashion in mines? Guess  the Louts and  Flouts’d  prefer name became INaction Fashions. 8